Don’t Kill It (2016;
Mark Mendez) opens with scenes of the Mississippi swamp where a man is hunting
with his dog. Ominous music and thunderclaps provide the backdrop as the dog
wanders off the trail and finds a strange looking object. That object, as we come
to know, contains an ancient demon which escapes to terrorize the small
Mississippi town where this film is set. The film makes use of the backwoods
landscape and the comical, dimwitted citizens of the small Southern town as it
shows us how the demon possesses one person after another, compelling them to
kill anyone who comes in sight. The violence in this movie is considerable
though not realistic -- in realism it reminded me of the original version of 200 Maniacs. We have several scenes of
carnage, of families being killed, of teenagers being obliterated. A number of
children are killed too, mostly off-screen. A demon killer named Jebediah
Woodley finds his way to town. He's played by Dolph Lundgren. Jebediah teams up
with FBI agent Evelyn Pierce to track down the demon. She has returned to the
town after a long absence. The difficulty about the demon is the fact that it
moves from one person's body to the next. When someone shoots the person whom
the demon has possessed, the demon immediately transitions to the killer’s
body. Hence the title of the film. If you kill the demon, he possesses you.
Instead of being killed, he needs to be contained. No one can tell who the
demon is, except for the way his or her eyes turn completely black and for the
shotgun or the pistol or the machete that he or she is carrying and the roaring
sound he or she makes as he or she runs towards the next victim – in other
words, the demon is fairly obvious. The plot is slightly more intricate than
I've made it out to be. We learn that the FBI agent Pierce is descended from an
angelic lineage, a fact that plays conveniently into the plot, though it's not
explained very well. Oddly, there's comedy in this film, which makes fun of the
limitations of the people of the small town, many of whom are dead by the end
of the film. This was a film so unlikely and so ludicrous that I found myself longing
before the midpoint for it to end yet at the same time not willing to give up
on it.
Don’t
Kill It employs a number of southern conventions: Gothicism, religious extremism, small-town
hokum, the supernatural, swamps. A fundamentalist minister in town is convinced
that the demon hunter Jebediah is himself the demon. He musters the paranoid
support of parishioners to try to stop the demon hunter and the FBI agent. I've
already mentioned the small town and its dimwitted citizens. A bumbling Barney
Fife-like policeman provides minor comic relief. Dolph Lundgren's character is
eccentric and mysterious and crazy. Lundgren does a good job with his
character. He's the only strong point of the film, in a relative way. But the
major relief this film provides comes when the closing credits roll.
---
Why a demon in a small Mississippi town? Is there anything
particularly southern about the demon in this film? I suppose demons, if you
believe in them, can appear anywhere. One could argue that the demon in Don't Shoot It incorporates all the
stereotypical worst traits of a small town southern resident: love of weapons,
love of violence, pleasure in shooting or assaulting anything, whether animal
or human, religious mania. This demon’s appearance in a Mississippi swamp is totally arbitrary,
which is not to say that arbitrariness somehow invalidates its existence there.
The appearance of the demon, which we can understand as a source of bad luck,
terrible events, misfortune, random chaos, that is, as a supernatural
explanation for anything evil that can happen in the world, is explanation
enough. We’re always looking for explanations. Explanations for what caused the
Deep Water Horizon disaster, what led to the attacks on the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon, what led to any number of terrible earthquakes or tsunami or
volcanic eruptions or hurricanes or tornadoes, for plagues. We’re always
grasping for explanations, and we’re always fearful of them. The demon in this
film is one explanation and it certainly calls enough for fear. But I prefer to
spend my time considering more plausible, rational, human, physical
explanations.
No comments:
Post a Comment